The Destructive Power In The Drive To Monopolization

monopoly board game on brown wooden table

I came across this article this morning on LinkedIn: My 2-year-old gave up his seat on an American Airlines flight. Where’s my refund! It’s a perplexing and bewildering series of responses by American Airlines’ customer service team. TLDR: John Bailey paid for a separate seat for his 2-year-old grandson, as required a federal law. An American flight attendant had the child give up their PURCHASED seat in order to accommodate another passenger’s comfort, with the airline then refusing to refund the purchase with a bewildering series of nonsensical responses. (Side note: I’m quite confident that these responses were AI Slop.) Resolution finally happened when the purchaser filed a complaint regarding the illegal request for the child to sit in the grandparent’s lap (federal law REQUIRES children over 2 to have their own seat. Something the airline kept overlooking…or not caring.

I see this as a classic case of Cory Doctorow’s “enshittification“. As airlines slide towards monopolies and competition collapses, they have no incentive to provide quality service. The monopolization and concentration of power is exploitive and destructive, as this case highlights.

Enshittification is, supposedly, more of an internet-based phenomenon. Monopolization has a wider impact, though. And both need to be addressed to move us towards a just and equitable future.

Is the move from big cities permanent?

Map of the US

My son and a number of my friends have asked what I think about all these people moving out of cities. Well, a Twitter friend, Bernie, posted this to his blog today: Iowa shows why the move from big cities may be only temporary. I agree with his assessment: cities offer more than affordability. I lived for the better part of 10 years in downtown Seattle and loved it. Arts and culture are a part of my soul. Having galleries, coffee shops, restaurants a short walk away delighted me deeply. One my favorite times in my life.

Anyway, Bernie references an article that looks at Iowan politics that might impeded this desire to attract the coastal urban dwellers to the mid-west*: Wood: About that public narrative we’re crafting to attract out-of-state people to move to Des Moines. Summation: the state’s anti-progressive agenda will impede growth. It’s an interesting point of view. For me, personally, politics might be a part, but, ultimately, the whole urban west coast thing is who I am. Even if they had the fastest internet on earth, I doubt I’d be heading east in a U-Haul.

 

*As a life-long west-coaster, I have long loved calling the middle part of the US the middle-east. 

Gravity Payments Boldness Pays Off

I remember back in 2015 when Mr. Price made this bold decision. It gives me great delight to see such solid results. Seattle is a greater place with innovators like Dan Price, especially those willing to disrupt more than just markets.

Reflecting on change

Reflecting on change

How economics push us

Some times, push us down